Eliza Dushku claims series star Michael Weatherly sexually harassed her on set and when she complained about it, she was fired in retaliation.
CBS has the right to handle sexual harassment allegations as they see fit, but it matters how those decisions are explained to reporters and audiences. The allegations brought against Michael Weatherly by Eliza Dushku from the set of "Bull" were serious and credible enough for the network to award her a $9.5 million settlement.
So why did they stick with Weatherly and his show, which is coming back for its fourth season in the fall? At the Television Critics Association press tour on Thursday, CBS President Kelly Kahl gave a surprisingly candid response, saying simply that their decision came down to ratings, which of course translate to money.

Court TV Plans Live Coverage of Harvey Weinstein Rape Trial -- Plus, 37-Part O.J. Simpson Docuseries
View Story"It's a very popular show," he told reporters per Variety. "More than 10 million people watch every week. Michael is loved by our audience, and even after these allegations came out, people continued to watch. It's a popular show we want to keep on our air, and it's a very good show as well."
In a larger discussion about accountability at the network, Kahl did go on to explain that both Weatherly and showrunner Glenn Gordon Caron are in leadership training as well. "It is implied in the name that is how to be a leader on the set, it's how to be a positive example for everyone," he explained.
But it is also not mandatory, per Kahl, so what exactly were the consequences Weatherly and Caron faced? Dushku's settlement was in response to allegations that she was sexually harassed by Weatherly and then fired by Caron when she brought it up, but those appear to have been paid by CBS.
Dushku appeared in the final three episodes of Season 1 with the intention of joining the cast for Season 2 onward.

Eliza Dushku Details Alleged Michael Weatherly Sexual Harassment, Calls Out CBS 'Spin'
View StoryIn response to Dushku's settlement going public, Amblin Television stepped away as a production partner on "Bull," as did Darryl Frank, Justin Falvey and Steven Spielberg as executive producers.
Calling it an "isolated incident," Kahl assured reporters that Weatherly expressed regret and remorse both when the incident was first brought up and again when the settlement was paid. He further said that all is well on the set now and there have been no further incidents.
For many, though, it feels like CBS is basically saying that the reason Weatherly has effectively paid no significant consequence for his alleged behavior is because he's on "a very popular show." That's an incredibly dangerous and reckless thing to say.
Imagine if the allegations against Bill Cosby had surfaced when "The Cosby Show" was the number one show on television? Imagine if FX had decided to stand by "Louie" and "Louis C.K." simply because the show was popular? More extreme examples to be certain, but justification at one level can easily lead to justification at more elevated levels.

Eliza Dushku Written Off 'Bull' Shortly After Confronting Star Michael Weatherly About Sexual Harassment
View StoryConversely, is Kahl suggesting that were "Bull" struggling in the ratings or on the bubble, the allegations might have mattered more to the future of the show? Coming from the network that saw its own head toppled when credible sexual misconduct allegations surfaced against Les Moonves, it's a little surprising how candid Kahl was about why "Bull" is still on the air.
It's the kind of statement, though, that could empower abusers and harassers into believing that all they have to do is have an incredibly successful show and they can get away with more inappropriate behavior than their colleagues on less "popular" shows. It also suggests that CBS might just wait to see if and how allegations affect a show's ratings before deciding how to respond to them.
The popularity of a show should have nothing to do with how credible harassment allegations are dealt with, and it certainly shouldn't be given as a reason why a show is still on the air after serious allegations and a settlement have been handed down. That can be the ultimate decision, but there simply have to be better reasons behind it than ratings.
We get it. Television is a business. But it is also about people and it is about fostering safe work environments free of prejudice, harassment and worse for the people creating it.
At some point, the bottom line has to be about more than the numbers, doesn't it?
Check out some of the online reactions to Kahl's comments below:

Jamie Lee Curtis Hopes Eliza Dushku's Molestation Allegation Awakens Us From 'Denial Slumber'
View StoryGot a story or a tip for us? Email TooFab editors at tips@toofab.com.